Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

his issue deals with the perennial Options
Previous Topic · Next Topic
pearljams
Posted: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:11:36 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/29/2010
Posts: 2
his issue deals with the perennial "Aryan question".

Some amount of confusion still reigns with regard to the terms 'Arya' or
'Aryans' that represent the language, the culture, the religion, the
people, and for some, even the 'race' of a certain section of prehistoric
South Asians. A clarification and discussion of the available data is in
order.

The following paper deals with these issues and to a large degree, with the
much debated question of the origin of the Arya: Either they are indigenous
to early South Asia or their existence is due to a (partial) influx of a
language and a culture that was of non-South Asian origins.

As in all the sciences, this debate should simply be a question of evidence
and proof, -- in this case one based on linguistic, textual,
archaeological, anthropological, genetic, etc. data. However, the issue has
become increasingly politicized. By now, it is the focal issue of recent
revisionist rewriting of old Indian history and even underlies much of
contemporary Indian politics.

The present paper, however, is not concerned with these political aspects,
but with the methods used and the facts that can be retrieved for an
adequate description of the original Aryans (technically, 'Indo-Aryans') of
early South Asia. Some of the questions asked here and answered below are
the following.

How can the ancient Indo-Aryans ("Aryans") of South Asia be defined and
what are their origins.? How were they described over the past one or two
hundred years and what exactly is the new autochthonous or indigenist
scenario? What are the arguments brought forward so far by the
autochthonists? How do these arguments agree with each other in a complete,
indigenous framework? And, perhaps more importantly, how does the new
theory agree with the evidence supplied by the various sciences and
humanities?

In sum, do we have a "new paradigm" or not?

The answer will be found at the end of the paper. It is divided into there
major sections, (and due to its length further subdivided for email
delivery into six sections):

1. The 'traditional' immigration theory of the past two centuries. (§1-10)

2. The 'autochthonous Aryan' theory: evidence from language (§12-18),
chronology (§19), archaeology and texts (§20-27), the texts and the
sciences (§28-31)

3. Summary of results (§32)

Due to its importance, the linguistic section is quite extensive (§12-18).
Linguisticially less inclined readers should skip most of it and proceed to
the linguistic summary in §18.

MW


================================================================================

A note on transcription.

Vedic and Sanskrit are transcribed here according to the Kyoto-Harvard
system, that is long a = A, retroflex t = T, palatal sh = z, etc. In
addition, IIr and Dardic dental affricate c = .c., and z = .z.

The Avestan alphabet is represented here as follows:
long e = E, long o = O, a topped by circle = a^o, nasal a = a, velar
nasal = ng (= Ved. G) , labial velar nasal = ngv;
implosive t = t~; interdental t (theta) = th, interdental d (delta) =
dh, bilabial w (beta) = w, velar g = g'; dental shibilant (with hacek) =
s', dental sibilant with underdot = S' = S~ ; labial velar affricate = xv.

For other languages, similar conventions are followed, e.g. French accented
e = e' (aigu), e` (grave), German umlaut a" = ae, o" = oe, u" = ue, etc.
================================================================================



Michael Witzel
Harvard University.







free mp3 download





Schuurtje
Dominican Republic photographer
Ontario vacation rentals
speedi
Posted: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:40:01 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/12/2010
Posts: 1
Location: green island
Yes Thanks i m agree with this keep it up i m new member here so Thump A++ for your post smile

Pyjamas
David2010
Posted: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:51:54 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/20/2010
Posts: 3
Location: india
hello guys, i thought Generally we open the bag and put them in...... besides "grab bag" just means an assortment.
Have ordered trees, plants, vines, etc online - usually they put each set of plants in a bag with wet tissue or something like that and put them all in a box of course.

free download
Users browsing this topic
Guest

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum Rss Feed : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 0.9.9 - 11/10/2004
Copyright © 2003-2004 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.209 seconds.